![]() ![]() : Canon EOS R5 C training series is released. I imagine Adobe users feel similarly about PS and Lr. I find it refined, consistent and predictable. Is it the end all, certainly not, but its nice to have at your disposal. Now that I'm only using Canon glass, DPP is a great asset again, but now I'm hooked on DxO's additional features, Deep Prime noise reduction, etc. The smaller guys don't, so its amazing that DxO continues to win awards with a footprint only a fraction of the size of Adobe. Adobe has an immense amount of resources available for development. Pay as you go isn't practical for a vendor either. ![]() You can't pause the subscription, so I'm not so keen on that. ![]() Some months I use editing software 3-4 days a week. I also do not care for a subscription and like owning the software. DxO had the lens support I needed and a host of some very unique features not offered elsewhere. ![]() I ended up going with DxO because I was using 3rd party glass with my DSLR and while I liked DPP, it fell short with images shot with my Sigma lenses. PS and Lr are great too, but you have to subscribe and the import process isn't as slick as some of the other solutions available. Its free and certainly works well with Canon's own hardware. If you are using Canon glass, DPP is hard to beat. None of them are perfect and each has its strengths. While Adobe Lr and Photoshop are widely regarded as industry standards, DxO Photo Lab is the application winning awards year over year. There are many great free editors available. Everyone has their preference and workflow. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |